Topflight Apps vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Topflight Apps (3.9/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) overall. Topflight Apps is the better choice for healthcare, fintech, and AI startups that prefer a monthly subscription over a large fixed-price contract.. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Topflight Apps vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Topflight Apps | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2016 |
| HQ | Irvine, CA, USA | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | ~40 (some directories list 51–200; likely inflated bracket) | 12–50 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Best for | Healthcare, fintech, and AI startups that prefer a monthly subscription over a large fixed-price contract. | Budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract. |
| Pricing model | Monthly subscription / dedicated team | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | $8K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Swift | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Financial services / fintech | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
Topflight Apps vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
Topflight Apps
Topflight Apps was founded in 2016 by CEO Joe Tuan and is based in Irvine, California, focused on healthcare, fintech, and AI app design and development for both Fortune 500 and startup clients. The company states a team of roughly 40, although some directories list 51–200 (treated as a likely inflated bracket). Its monthly-subscription engagement model is a genuine differentiator from the fixed-price or T&M norm found across most of this roster.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio launched in 2016 as 'MainCode Agency' before rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020; 2016 is used as the founding year since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London, UK location, the studio reports 12–50 employees depending on source. It offers subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps — one of two subscription comparators in this roster alongside Eleken.
Services and capabilities: Topflight Apps vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | Topflight Apps | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Topflight Apps vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | Topflight Apps | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Topflight Apps vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | Topflight Apps | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $8K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Subscription, Dedicated team | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Topflight Apps vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | Topflight Apps | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Financial services / fintech | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Healthcare app design and AI feature development, Fintech app redesign on an ongoing subscription basis | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Subscription | Subscription |
Topflight Apps vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| Topflight Apps | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing gives more budget predictability than a fixed-scope contract for an evolving product |
| + | Focused specifically on healthcare, fintech, and AI — three of the more compliance-heavy verticals |
| + | Serves both Fortune 500 and startup clients, offering flexible scale |
| + | Nearly a decade of continuous operation under its founding CEO |
| - | Reported team size is inconsistent across sources (company states ~40; some directories list 51–200, likely inflated) |
| - | Heavy AI-development emphasis may be a weaker fit for clients purely focused on visual/brand design |
| - | Monthly-subscription pricing can exceed a fixed-scope project's cost for a well-defined, short engagement |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this roster, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose Topflight Apps?
Topflight Apps is the right choice for healthcare, fintech, and AI startups that prefer a monthly subscription over a large fixed-price contract..
A monthly-subscription engagement model built specifically around healthcare, fintech, and AI app development. Minimum engagement starts at $8K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Healthcare, Financial services / fintech.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the right choice for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
One of the most accessible entry points in this roster via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Topflight Apps vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Topflight Apps |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Topflight Apps |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Topflight Apps |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Topflight Apps vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | Topflight Apps fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare app design and AI feature development | Strong | Limited | Topflight Apps |
| Fintech app redesign on an ongoing subscription basis | Strong | Limited | Topflight Apps |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Topflight Apps vs Spaceberry Studio
Topflight Apps (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A monthly-subscription engagement model built specifically around healthcare, fintech, and AI app development. It is best for healthcare, fintech, and AI startups that prefer a monthly subscription over a large fixed-price contract..
Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) is the better choice when budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. If your situation matches those criteria, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Topflight Apps vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is Topflight Apps better than Spaceberry Studio?
Topflight Apps (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Topflight Apps is better for healthcare, fintech, and AI startups that prefer a monthly subscription over a large fixed-price contract.. Spaceberry Studio is better for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
How do Topflight Apps and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
Topflight Apps uses monthly subscription / dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $8K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Topflight Apps or Spaceberry Studio?
Topflight Apps is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Topflight Apps and Spaceberry Studio?
Topflight Apps's primary differentiator is: a monthly-subscription engagement model built specifically around healthcare, fintech, and ai app development. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this roster via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (~40 (some directories list 51–200; likely inflated bracket) vs 12–50), minimum engagement ($8K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.