Gapsy Studio vs UXDA: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of UXDA (4.2/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history.. UXDA is the stronger option for banks and fintech companies that want a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Gapsy Studio vs UXDA: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| HQ | Dnipro, Ukraine | Riga, Latvia |
| Team size | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) | 25+ |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Best for | Fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history. | Banks and fintech companies that want a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, retainer |
| Min. engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, After Effects | Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail | Financial services / fintech |
Gapsy Studio vs UXDA: overview
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio describes itself as operating 'since 2014' (also citing '9+ years of experience'; treated here as self-reported), based in Dnipro, Ukraine. Instead of publishing a headcount, the studio positions itself as a 'collective of creative professionals' behind 500+ completed projects. It holds a 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews and 13+ international awards spanning Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush, working across UI/UX, branding, motion, and web/app development for fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail clients.
UXDA
UXDA (Financial UX Design) launched in 2015 under Alex Kreger and co-founder Linda, based in Riga, Latvia with a 25+ multidisciplinary team. Over a decade, UXDA has defined or governed 150+ banking and fintech digital platforms across 39 countries — an exclusively financial-services focus that makes it the clearest fintech specialist among the boutiques in this roster.
Services and capabilities: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Capability | Gapsy Studio | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Framework / platform | Gapsy Studio | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | ✓ |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Retainer |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Dimension | Gapsy Studio | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Gapsy Studio vs UXDA: pros and cons
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this roster |
| + | 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team |
| - | Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA |
| UXDA | |
|---|---|
| + | Exclusive financial-services focus gives it domain expertise generalist studios simply can't match |
| + | 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries over a decade |
| + | Small, senior 25+ team keeps client relationships direct rather than layered through account management |
| + | A decade of continuous, single-vertical operation compounds domain knowledge over time |
| - | The exclusive fintech focus is a real limitation for any client outside financial services |
| - | $30K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) runs higher than most 25-person boutiques |
| - | Small team size (25+) caps capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs |
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the right choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Who should choose UXDA?
UXDA is the right choice for banks and fintech companies that want a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX..
The only agency in this roster exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Gapsy Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Gapsy Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Gapsy Studio |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Use case | Gapsy Studio fit | UXDA fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Strong | Limited | Gapsy Studio |
| Bank digital platform redesign | Limited | Strong | UXDA |
| Fintech app UX for a regulated market | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. It is best for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
UXDA (4.2/5) is the better choice when banks and fintech companies that want a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX.. If your situation matches those criteria, UXDA is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Gapsy Studio vs UXDA FAQ
Is Gapsy Studio better than UXDA?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Gapsy Studio is better for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history.. UXDA is better for banks and fintech companies that want a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX..
How do Gapsy Studio and UXDA differ in pricing?
Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). UXDA uses fixed project, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Gapsy Studio or UXDA?
Gapsy Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Gapsy Studio and UXDA?
Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a 5.0/5.0 clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from behance, awwwards, and fwa. UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only agency in this roster exclusively focused on financial services ux, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. They also differ in team size (Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) vs 25+), minimum engagement ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software vs Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.